Recenzie 9Liana Mos et al – articol de jurnal plagiat copy/paste


Alege limba  
Plagiat peste 95% din continut.

Plagiat peste 95% din continut.

Prof Liana Mos de la Facultatea de Medicina Farmacie si Medicina Dentara din Universitatea de Vest Vasile Goldis”, Arad, Romania, impreuna cu 6 alti autori, au fost identificati ca plagiind in extenso in articolul “Cytokine and atherogenesis“, publicat de “Arad Medical Journal” in 2009, confirmat de experti internationali mai jos.

Printre cei 7 autori se gasesc:

Lista completa a autorilor se gaseste in sectiunea Raport de mai jos.

Un semnal pentru restrictionarea fondurilor de granturi

Printre sanctiunile asupra jurnalului si autorilor, expertii internationali de mai jos recomanda ca autorii sa fie exclusi de sursele de finantare si stopati in a promova in functie.  Din lista de mai sus putem observa ca un Profesor a devenit Rector al Universitatii ulterior publicarii articolului. Nu putem decat specula care ar fi fost destinul daca acest caz de plagiat ar fi fost scos la iveala mai devreme.

Fisiere atasate

Stii pe cineva cu expertiza in acest domeniu?

De ce sa nu-i recomanzi sau sa-i inviti sa raspunda intrebarilor acestei recenzii?  

Tu ai expertiza inaproape de acest domeniu?

De ce sa nu raspunzi intrebarilor recenziei si sa te alaturi celorlalti academici si experti?  
 

Ce spun expertii de pana acum

Recenziile de mai jos au fost trimise de experti independenti. Ei au fost invitati de persoane independente ca si tine (academici sau publicul larg) sa raspunda intrebarilor de pe Integru.org.

Dr Miguella Mark-Carew, USA
Dr Miguella Mark-Carew (web)
College of Veterinary Medicine
Cornell University, USA
 . . .  The purpose of a review article is to amass information from several different sources into one document that harmoniously ties the information together. When properly done, a review article is  . . .

Q1. Conduita. In ce masura, acest material si conduita se conformeaza normelor etice, dupa cunostinta dumneavoastra?

The purpose of a review article is to amass information from several different sources into one document that harmoniously ties the information together. When properly done, a review article is particularly useful in that it aggregates literature on a particular research topic or field, providing readers with easier access to relevant areas of interests and potential collaborations with researchers with similar academic interests, supplementing the need to conduct a literature search. The article in question does amass information from several sources, but in a manner that is inaccurate, misleading, blatantly plagiarized, and taken from several sources there were not referenced. The authors did not comply with ethical norms prior to submitting this manuscript for publication.

Q2. Zona gri. Exista elemente controversate care nu pot fi calificate in mod clar ca fiind abateri?

The only grey area I foresee in this situation is the use of uncopyrighted PowerPoint presentations; though, there the author of the PowerPoint presentation could have been acknowledged.

Q3. Urmari. In opinia dvs., care ar trebui sa fie urmarile in aceasta situatie? Puteti avea in vedere proceduri, asteptari intr-un context international, comparatii cu situatii similare, posibil impact etc.

The article should be retracted from the journal. Past research material from these authors should be highly scrutinized for accuracy and possible plagiarism. The reviewers of the article should be questioned to determine if they were aware of the misuse of references and/or for blatant plagiarism. The disregard and lack of respect of the work of others within the scientific community is disappointing. It is my hope that the University’s ethical board understands the weight of this issue and acts appropriately.

Dr Ivan Liachko, USA
Dr Ivan Liachko (web)
Department of Genome Sciences, School of Medicine
University of Washington, USA
 . . .  The authors directly copied large segments of content from two published papers (Calabrese et al and Daugherty et al) as well as two presentations and one course lecture summary document  . . .

Q1. Conduita. In ce masura, acest material si conduita se conformeaza normelor etice, dupa cunostinta dumneavoastra?

The authors directly copied large segments of content from two published papers (Calabrese et al and Daugherty et al) as well as two presentations and one course lecture summary document. The authors have a bibliography, but do not reference the papers that were the sources of copied information, indicating an intent to conceal the plagiarism. Sections of text lifted from published source materials were edited in a way that makes them inconsistent with the tables of data and internally inconsistent with the text of the paper, also indicating an intent to deceive the reader. The data tables were clearly copied and pasted as images directly from the source material, indicating laziness.

This is a clear case of intentional plagiarism as all the text within the paper can be directly traced to another work. This material does not meet even basic ethical standards of scientific publishing.

Q2. Zona gri. Exista elemente controversate care nu pot fi calificate in mod clar ca fiind abateri?

Direct plagiarism is never acceptable, the only grey area I can think of is the copying from unpublished lecture slides.

Q3. Urmari. In opinia dvs., care ar trebui sa fie urmarile in aceasta situatie? Puteti avea in vedere proceduri, asteptari intr-un context international, comparatii cu situatii similare, posibil impact etc.

I believe the scientific community should be made aware of this instance of plagiarism. The material should be publicly retracted from the journal and the retraction should be visible anytime the article is accessed. This would prevent the authors from benefiting from the ignorance of others of this act of misconduct. The authors should be reprimanded with being blocked from funding sources and other professional promotions.

Ethics enforcement is especially important for less prominent institutions as they must work harder for legitimacy than more established universities.

Dr Michael Autieri, USA
Dr Michael Autieri (web)
Department of Physiology
Temple University School of Medicine, USA
 . . .  using exact text from published articles, Daugherty and Calabrese are blatant plagerism and the fact that they are not referenced are unforgivable. lifting exact text from the lectured posted on-line,  . . .

Q1. Conduita. In ce masura, acest material si conduita se conformeaza normelor etice, dupa cunostinta dumneavoastra?

using exact text from published articles, Daugherty and Calabrese are blatant plagerism and the fact that they are not referenced are unforgivable. lifting exact text from the lectured posted on-line, although lazy and poor scholarship, may not be plagerism from those authors as we do not know the source where they came from. Further, they are not copy righted.

In all, a poor article that should be retracted just from the innaccuracies, typographical errors, and missspellings. the journal should be sanctioned as well for obviously no due dilagence on peer review

Q2. Zona gri. Exista elemente controversate care nu pot fi calificate in mod clar ca fiind abateri?

no. they plagerized two published articles.

Q3. Urmari. In opinia dvs., care ar trebui sa fie urmarile in aceasta situatie? Puteti avea in vedere proceduri, asteptari intr-un context international, comparatii cu situatii similare, posibil impact etc.

author and publisher should be sanctioned. author should not be eligable to receive grant money or publish in international peer-reviewed journals

Raport

Misconduct Plagiat copy/paste in articol de jurnal
Severity Peste 95% de continut efectiv
Document "Cytokine and atherogenesis", Arad Medical Journal, 2009
Institutions "Vasile Goldis" University, Arad, Romania University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa", Iasi, Romania
Date 2009
Authors (time of writing)
  • Prof Liana Mos - Decan - Facultatea de Medicina, Farmacie si Medicina Dentara, Universitatea "Vasile Goldis"
  • Prof Corina Zorila - Pro-Decan - aceeasi Facultate si Universitate
  • Prof Coralia Cotoraci - Profesor - aceeasi Facultate si Universitate
  • Dr Ioana Dana Alexa - Lector si Pro-Decan - Facultatea de Medicina, Universitatea "Gr. T Popa"
  • Wiener Adrian, Grec Veronica, and Alina Marian - ? - Facultatea de Medicina, Farmacie si Medicina Dentara, Universitatea "Vasile Goldis"
Authors (now)

Lasa un comentariu

Esti binevenit sa lasi comentarii publice. Asigura-te totusi ca nu sunt in afara subiectului, abuzive sau neadecvate.

2 comentarii

Lasă un răspuns către readeronline Scoate afara

Emailul nu va fi afisat. Campurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *.

Poți folosi aceste etichete HTML și atribute: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>